Sep 5, 2025 • 10 min read
When companies talk about “supplier responsibility,” we usually picture audits, codes of conduct, and questionnaires. All necessary—yet often not sufficient alone. If buyers want real, near-term emissions reductions in their supply chains, they need to give suppliers practical tools that help them move from paperwork to performance.
That’s where the Carbon Savings Account® (CSA) comes in. The CSA is a flexible employee benefit that addresses scope 3, category 7 (employee commute and work-from-home emissions) that can help suppliers meet buyer standards and achieve climate targets.
The CSA is an on-ramp for supplier responsibility that turns intent into measurable reductions suppliers can point to in CDP, EcoVadis, SBTi, and CSRD narratives.
The supply chain is typically where the bulk of corporate climate impact lives. CDP’s global analysis shows that upstream emissions (scope 3) are, on average, 11.4x higher than a company’s direct operational (scope 1 & 2) footprint. That’s why it’s becoming the norm for the industry to believe that purchasers can’t meet climate goals without engaging suppliers.
The good news: supplier engagement works. CDP reports that suppliers, spurred by buyer programs, cut 43 million tonnes of CO₂e in one recent year—that’s more than Sweden’s annual emissions—demonstrating that structured buyer-supplier collaboration drives real results.
Policy momentum is adding urgency globally. Governments and regulators are moving beyond voluntary disclosure frameworks and making supply chain accountability a legal requirement. From Europe to the United States, new directives and climate disclosure laws are forcing companies—and by extension their suppliers—to collect better data, address environmental and social risks, and show verifiable progress on emissions reductions.
In the EU, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) applies starting with 2024 financial year reports (published in 2025), driving greater transparency across value chains, while the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), which entered into force in July 2024, requires companies to identify and address human rights and environmental impacts throughout their global value chains. In the U.S., California’s SB 253 requires large companies doing business in the state to begin disclosing Scope 1 and 2 emissions in 2026 (based on FY2025 data) and Scope 3 emissions in 2027 (based on FY2026 data), effectively pushing suppliers to strengthen data quality, governance, and reduction strategies.
Additionally, standards are aligning with this direction. The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) requires companies with material scope 3 to set targets that cover at least 67% of scope 3 emissions, and many leaders are now pairing near-term and net-zero targets.
And yet, the supplier responsibility baseline is still uneven. S&P Global’s Corporate Sustainability Assessment data shows only 44.5% of 9,688 assessed companies publicly disclose a supplier code of conduct, and when such codes exist, they often emphasize labor and ethics far more than environmental performance. Meanwhile, only a share of disclosing companies systematically engage suppliers on climate each year (about 41% in a recent analysis). There’s a lot of room—and need—for practical enablement.
Supplier engagement isn’t a “nice to have”—it’s stipulated.
The CSA is an employee benefit that funds low-carbon home and personal transportation upgrades—think commuting electrification and mode shift (e-bikes, transit, EV charging), work-from-home efficiency (LEDs, smart plugs, heat pumps, weatherization), and other household-level decarbonization investments. It’s as simple as:
For buyers, the CSA is a turnkey way to help suppliers:
For suppliers, the CSA is an engagement, education, and retention-friendly employee benefit that reduces commuting and work-from-home emissions (scope 3, category 7), which can also improve competitiveness in sustainable procurement assessments and supply chain questionnaires.
Think of the CSA as a supplier-enablement tool that buyers can deploy across strategic and long-tail suppliers. Instead of relying only on audits, disclosures, or compliance language, the CSA gives suppliers something practical they can implement quickly—an employee-facing benefit that delivers measurable emissions reductions, improves workforce engagement, and generates disclosure-ready data. By equipping suppliers with a turnkey solution that’s both climate-positive and people-positive, buyers can accelerate scope 3 progress, strengthen supplier relationships, and create a more resilient, future-ready value chain. Below are a few examples of how this can be rolled out.
In this model, the buying company establishes a pool of funds that eligible suppliers can access to support their employees’ CSAs. The funds may be provided as matching contributions or full sponsorship, with priority given to strategic suppliers or those in high-emissions categories. This approach removes budget friction for smaller suppliers, boosts program adoption, and rapidly scales a credible climate benefit across the value chain. Suppliers benefit from immediate employee goodwill, while also generating a quantifiable stream of emissions reductions that can be disclosed in reporting frameworks.
What this looks like in practice: A global buyer identifies 50 strategic suppliers in emissions-intensive categories and co-funds CSAs at 50-100% for the first year. Incentives are stacked for high employee enrollment and CO2e avoided. Suppliers receive a turnkey starter kit—including policy templates, approved spending categories, and ready-to-use communications assets—alongside employer dashboards to track progress and support disclosures.
Another option is to integrate CSA participation into procurement processes. Buyers can include green employee benefits programs and CSA-related policies and outcomes in RFX questionnaires (RFPs, RFIs, and RFQs) and supplier scorecards, alongside traditional climate metrics such as emissions targets, renewable energy procurement, and product-level carbon footprints. By embedding the CSA into sourcing criteria, buyers send a clear market signal that low-carbon employee engagement matters. Suppliers quickly see that offering programs like the CSA can strengthen their bids, improve their chances of preferred supplier status, and help them win more business. This approach encourages proactive investment in employee-level decarbonization—such as commuting or work-from-home efficiency—without relying solely on mandates or audits.
What this looks like in practice: A company revises its procurement scorecard to award points for employee-level decarbonization programs like the CSA. In competitive bids, suppliers with the CSA in place are more likely to reach the shortlist or secure preferred supplier status. Over time, this drives adoption across the supply base as suppliers recognize CSA participation as a differentiator that directly affects contract opportunities.
For suppliers earlier in their climate journey, CSA can be paired with training and enablement. Suppliers receive guidance on how to design and launch a commuting policy, communicate benefits to employees, measure enrollment and impact, and align CSA program outcomes with buyer expectations under frameworks like SBTi or CSRD. Since many suppliers—especially small and mid-sized businesses—struggle with limited internal ESG capacity, this approach helps them overcome barriers to adoption while building the documentation and processes needed for credible reporting.
What this looks like in practice: A buyer launches supplier development and training with a cohort of 20 suppliers who are just beginning to address scope 3 emissions. Suppliers join training sessions and receive templates for program design, internal communications, and data tracking. Scope Zero provides ongoing support, helping suppliers quickly stand up programs that employees embrace and that generate disclosure-ready emissions reductions. Within the first year, the buyer is able to demonstrate meaningful progress across a portion of its supply chain while helping its partners build long-term capability.
Suppliers still need to decarbonize operations (scope 1 & 2) and quantify product footprints for scope 3, category 1 (Purchased Goods & Services). The CSA doesn’t replace renewable PPAs or low-carbon materials. But instead, the CSA can:
Turning supplier responsibility from a policy into real progress doesn’t have to be complicated. Buyers can take a structured, step-by-step approach that aligns with existing procurement and sustainability processes. By starting small, signaling seriousness, and building in the right data practices from the beginning, organizations can quickly demonstrate impact while setting the stage for scalable supplier engagement.
To understand why supplier enablement tools like the CSA matter, it helps to zoom out on the bigger picture. The numbers tell a consistent story: supply chain emissions dwarf operational footprints, most companies still lack robust supplier policies, and regulations are closing in fast.
At the same time, evidence shows that when buyers do engage, suppliers respond—and measurable reductions follow. The following facts and stats highlight both the scale of the challenge and the opportunity for companies that take supplier responsibility seriously.
No company has to tackle supply chain decarbonization alone. A growing set of initiatives, frameworks, and collaborations exist to help buyers and suppliers align on data, targets, and action. From CDP’s Supply Chain membership program to practical guides on scope 3 reduction and cross-industry efforts like the Partnership for Carbon Transparency (PACT), these resources provide structure and momentum for organizations looking to turn supplier responsibility into measurable results.
Sign up for our newsletter to stay up-to-date on all things Scope Zero.